Analytical sensitivity of six lateral flow antigen test kits for variant strains of SARS-CoV-2

Yoshitomo Morinaga*, Hiroshi Yamada, Yoshihiro Yoshida, Hitoshi Kawasuji, Yoshihiro Yamamoto

*この論文の責任著者

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

7 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Introduction: The lateral flow antigen test is a useful tool for rapid diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The analytical sensitivity of six lateral flow antigen test kits was compared. Methods: The limit of detection (LoD) and time to positive results were evaluated for six lateral flow tests including ImmunoArrow®, ESPLINE® SARS-CoV-2, QuickNavi™ COVID19 Ag, ImmunoAce® SARS-CoV-2, Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device, and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test using the heat-inactivated virus. The LoD of ImmunoArrow® against the Omicron variants was compared with that against the wild-type using recombinant proteins. Results: ImmunoArrow® and ESPLINE® showed the lowest LoD. The time to positive results of all tests except for ESPLINE® was within 200 s in the evaluation at high dose of antigens (2.5 × 105 TCID50/mL) and 500 s in the evaluation at low dose of antigens (2.5 × 104 TCID50/mL). The LoD of ImmunoArrow® against the Omicron variants was the same concentration against the wild-type antigen. Conclusions: ImmunoArrow® detected SARS-CoV-2 antigens including the Omicron variants with good sensitivity among the six lateral flow antigen tests. These finding support that it can support the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 with the good sensitivity.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)131-135
ページ数5
ジャーナルJournal of Infection and Chemotherapy
29
2
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2023/02

ASJC Scopus 主題領域

  • 微生物学(医療)
  • 感染症
  • 薬理学(医学)

フィンガープリント

「Analytical sensitivity of six lateral flow antigen test kits for variant strains of SARS-CoV-2」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル