Comparison of central venous port procedures between puncture vs. cut-down and residents vs. senior surgeons

Ryota Otsubo*, Hiroshi Yano, Megumi Matsumoto, Aya Tanaka, Takashi Nonaka, Shigekazu Hidaka, Keitaro Matsumoto, Tomoshi Tsuchiya, Shuntaro Sato, Takeshi Nagayasu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aim: To compare operative results between venous puncture (P) with real-time ultrasonography vs. cut-down (CD) with preoperative ultrasonography for totally implantable central vein access device (TICVAD) implantation performed by residents (R) vs. senior surgeons (S). Patients and Methods: Adult oncologic patients (n=268) undergoing TICVAD implantations were retrospectively compared between 172 Ps and 96 CDs. Then, we compared Ps performed by R (P-R, n=131) and S (P-S, n=41) and CDs performed by R (CD-R, n=59) and S (CD-S, n=37). Results: Median operation times were 40 min in the P group and 53.5 min in the CD group, and times were significantly shorter for P-S and CD-S. Completion rates were comparable for each method and each surgeon. Intraoperative complication rates were 3.8% (P-R), 2.4% (P-S), and 0% (CD-R and CD-S). Conclusion: P with real-time ultrasonography did not avoid complications compared to CD with preoperative ultrasonography. The latter performed safely even by residents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1197-1204
Number of pages8
JournalIn Vivo
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021/03

Keywords

  • Education
  • Implantable catheters
  • Punctures
  • Residency
  • Venous cutdown

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of central venous port procedures between puncture vs. cut-down and residents vs. senior surgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this