TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence support improves diagnosis accuracy in anterior segment eye diseases
AU - Maehara, Hiroki
AU - Ueno, Yuta
AU - Yamaguchi, Takefumi
AU - Kitaguchi, Yoshiyuki
AU - Miyazaki, Dai
AU - Nejima, Ryohei
AU - Inomata, Takenori
AU - Kato, Naoko
AU - Chikama, Tai Ichiro
AU - Ominato, Jun
AU - Yunoki, Tatsuya
AU - Tsubota, Kinya
AU - Oda, Masahiro
AU - Suzutani, Manabu
AU - Sekiryu, Tetsuju
AU - Oshika, Tetsuro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - CorneAI, a deep learning model designed for diagnosing cataracts and corneal diseases, was assessed for its impact on ophthalmologists’ diagnostic accuracy. In the study, 40 ophthalmologists (20 specialists and 20 residents) classified 100 images, including iPhone 13 Pro photos (50 images) and diffuser slit-lamp photos (50 images), into nine categories (normal condition, infectious keratitis, immunological keratitis, corneal scar, corneal deposit, bullous keratopathy, ocular surface tumor, cataract/intraocular lens opacity, and primary angle-closure glaucoma). The iPhone and slit-lamp images represented the same cases. After initially answering without CorneAI, the same ophthalmologists responded to the same cases with CorneAI 2–4 weeks later. With CorneAI’s support, the overall accuracy of ophthalmologists increased significantly from 79.2 to 88.8% (P < 0.001). Specialists’ accuracy rose from 82.8 to 90.0%, and residents’ from 75.6 to 86.2% (P < 0.001). Smartphone image accuracy improved from 78.7 to 85.5% and slit-lamp image accuracy from 81.2 to 90.6% (both, P < 0.001). In this study, CorneAI’s own accuracy was 86%, but its support enhanced ophthalmologists’ accuracy beyond the CorneAI’s baseline. This study demonstrated that CorneAI, despite being trained on diffuser slit-lamp images, effectively improved diagnostic accuracy, even with smartphone images.
AB - CorneAI, a deep learning model designed for diagnosing cataracts and corneal diseases, was assessed for its impact on ophthalmologists’ diagnostic accuracy. In the study, 40 ophthalmologists (20 specialists and 20 residents) classified 100 images, including iPhone 13 Pro photos (50 images) and diffuser slit-lamp photos (50 images), into nine categories (normal condition, infectious keratitis, immunological keratitis, corneal scar, corneal deposit, bullous keratopathy, ocular surface tumor, cataract/intraocular lens opacity, and primary angle-closure glaucoma). The iPhone and slit-lamp images represented the same cases. After initially answering without CorneAI, the same ophthalmologists responded to the same cases with CorneAI 2–4 weeks later. With CorneAI’s support, the overall accuracy of ophthalmologists increased significantly from 79.2 to 88.8% (P < 0.001). Specialists’ accuracy rose from 82.8 to 90.0%, and residents’ from 75.6 to 86.2% (P < 0.001). Smartphone image accuracy improved from 78.7 to 85.5% and slit-lamp image accuracy from 81.2 to 90.6% (both, P < 0.001). In this study, CorneAI’s own accuracy was 86%, but its support enhanced ophthalmologists’ accuracy beyond the CorneAI’s baseline. This study demonstrated that CorneAI, despite being trained on diffuser slit-lamp images, effectively improved diagnostic accuracy, even with smartphone images.
KW - AI support
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Ocular surface
KW - Slit-lamp image
KW - Smartphone image
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218844512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-025-89768-6
DO - 10.1038/s41598-025-89768-6
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 39934383
AN - SCOPUS:85218844512
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 15
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 5117
ER -