TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic antimicrobial agents in urologic laparoscopic surgery
T2 - 1-Day versus 3-day treatments
AU - Takeyama, Koh
AU - Slumizu, Toshiaki
AU - Mutoh, Masatoshi
AU - Nishiyama, Naotaka
AU - Kunishima, Yasuharu
AU - Matsukawa, Masanori
AU - Takahashi, Satoshi
AU - Hotta, Hiroshi
AU - Itoh, Naoki
AU - Tsukamoto, Taiji
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - Although the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) is generally low in laparoscopic urologic surgery, the standard protocol for prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents remains to be established. We retrospectively compared the incidence and severity of SSI after laparoscopic surgery between two different protocols for prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents. This study included 114 patients who underwent urologic laparoscopic surgery categorized as "clean" or "clean-contaminated" in Sapporo Medical University School Hospital between January 1996 and October 2002. As a prophylactic antimicrobial agent, one of the cephalosporins or penicillins was administered intravenously to all patients. For 46 consecutive patients between January 1996 and July 2000, an antimicrobial agent was given 30min before operation and thereafter every 12h on the same day and the next 2 days after operation (the 3-day group). For 68 consecutive patients from August 2000 to October 2002, an antimicrobial agent was given once 30 min before operation and was additionally given only in the evening or night of the day of operation (the 1-day group). The incidence of SSI was retrospectively investigated. There were two patients who developed SSI in each group (4.3% in the 3-day group and 2.9% in the 1-day group). The incidence of SSI was not significantly different between the two groups. The 1-day protocol has efficacy equal to that of the 3-day protocol in prophylaxis of SSI. The 1-day use of a prophylactic antimicrobial agent may be recommended for the clean or clean-contaminated urologic laparoscopic surgery described above.
AB - Although the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) is generally low in laparoscopic urologic surgery, the standard protocol for prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents remains to be established. We retrospectively compared the incidence and severity of SSI after laparoscopic surgery between two different protocols for prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents. This study included 114 patients who underwent urologic laparoscopic surgery categorized as "clean" or "clean-contaminated" in Sapporo Medical University School Hospital between January 1996 and October 2002. As a prophylactic antimicrobial agent, one of the cephalosporins or penicillins was administered intravenously to all patients. For 46 consecutive patients between January 1996 and July 2000, an antimicrobial agent was given 30min before operation and thereafter every 12h on the same day and the next 2 days after operation (the 3-day group). For 68 consecutive patients from August 2000 to October 2002, an antimicrobial agent was given once 30 min before operation and was additionally given only in the evening or night of the day of operation (the 1-day group). The incidence of SSI was retrospectively investigated. There were two patients who developed SSI in each group (4.3% in the 3-day group and 2.9% in the 1-day group). The incidence of SSI was not significantly different between the two groups. The 1-day protocol has efficacy equal to that of the 3-day protocol in prophylaxis of SSI. The 1-day use of a prophylactic antimicrobial agent may be recommended for the clean or clean-contaminated urologic laparoscopic surgery described above.
KW - Antimicrobial agents
KW - Prophylaxis
KW - Surgical site infection
KW - Urologic laparoscopic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843121861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10156-004-0317-3
DO - 10.1007/s10156-004-0317-3
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 15290456
AN - SCOPUS:3843121861
SN - 1341-321X
VL - 10
SP - 168
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
IS - 3
ER -