TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of HER2, EGFR, and c-MET status on overall survival of advanced gastric cancer patients
AU - Fuse, Nozomu
AU - Kuboki, Yasutoshi
AU - Kuwata, Takeshi
AU - Nishina, Tomohiro
AU - Kadowaki, Shigenori
AU - Shinozaki, Eiji
AU - Machida, Nozomu
AU - Yuki, Satoshi
AU - Ooki, Akira
AU - Kajiura, Shinya
AU - Kimura, Tetsuo
AU - Yamanaka, Takeharu
AU - Shitara, Kohei
AU - Nagatsuma, Akiko Kawano
AU - Yoshino, Takayuki
AU - Ochiai, Atsushi
AU - Ohtsu, Atsushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Background: This study was conducted to investigate whether human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, and c-MET status are independent prognostic factors for advanced gastric cancer patients who received standard chemotherapy. Method: Unresectable or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma treated with S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy were eligible. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were examined for HER2, EGFR, and c-MET status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Additionally, gene amplification was examined using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2. Positivity was defined as an IHC score of 3+ or an IHC score of 2+/FISH positive for HER2, and an IHC score of 2+ or 3+ for both EGFR and c-MET. Results: Of the 293 patients from nine institutions, 43 (15 %) were HER2 positive, 79 (27 %) were EGFR positive, and 120 (41 %) were c-MET positive. Ten patients (3 %) showed positive co-expression of HER2, EGFR, and c-MET. After a median follow-up time of 58.4 months with 280 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) in terms of HER2 and EGFR status. However, there was a significant difference in OS between c-MET-positive and c-MET-negative patients [median, 11.9 months vs 14.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.31 (95 % confidence interval, 1.03–1.67); log-rank P = 0.024]. Multivariate analysis also showed that c-MET positivity was still a prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio, 1.30 (95 % confidence interval, 1.02–1.67); P = 0.037]. Conclusions: The study suggested that c-MET-positive status had poor prognostic value. These data could be used as the basis for future clinical trials for targeting agents for advanced gastric cancer patients.
AB - Background: This study was conducted to investigate whether human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, and c-MET status are independent prognostic factors for advanced gastric cancer patients who received standard chemotherapy. Method: Unresectable or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma treated with S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy were eligible. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were examined for HER2, EGFR, and c-MET status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Additionally, gene amplification was examined using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2. Positivity was defined as an IHC score of 3+ or an IHC score of 2+/FISH positive for HER2, and an IHC score of 2+ or 3+ for both EGFR and c-MET. Results: Of the 293 patients from nine institutions, 43 (15 %) were HER2 positive, 79 (27 %) were EGFR positive, and 120 (41 %) were c-MET positive. Ten patients (3 %) showed positive co-expression of HER2, EGFR, and c-MET. After a median follow-up time of 58.4 months with 280 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) in terms of HER2 and EGFR status. However, there was a significant difference in OS between c-MET-positive and c-MET-negative patients [median, 11.9 months vs 14.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.31 (95 % confidence interval, 1.03–1.67); log-rank P = 0.024]. Multivariate analysis also showed that c-MET positivity was still a prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio, 1.30 (95 % confidence interval, 1.02–1.67); P = 0.037]. Conclusions: The study suggested that c-MET-positive status had poor prognostic value. These data could be used as the basis for future clinical trials for targeting agents for advanced gastric cancer patients.
KW - Epidermal growth factor receptor
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Gastroesophageal junction cancer
KW - Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
KW - c-MET
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951570502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10120-015-0471-6
DO - 10.1007/s10120-015-0471-6
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 25682441
AN - SCOPUS:84951570502
SN - 1436-3291
VL - 19
SP - 183
EP - 191
JO - Gastric Cancer
JF - Gastric Cancer
IS - 1
ER -