Prognostic differences among Grade Group 4 subgroups in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Takeshi Sasaki, Shin Ebara, Tomoyuki Tatenuma, Yoshinori Ikehata, Akinori Nakayama, Daiki Kato, Masahiro Toide, Tatsuaki Yoneda, Kazushige Sakaguchi, Jun Teishima, Kazuhide Makiyama, Hiroshi Kitamura, Kazutaka Saito, Takuya Koie, Fumitaka Koga, Shinji Urakami, Takahiro Inoue*

*この論文の責任著者

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

3 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Objectives: To investigate whether the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 4 (GG 4) subgroups have different oncological outcomes in Japanese prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study in PCa patients undergoing RARP at 10 institutions in Japan. Pre- and post-operative variables were collected from enrolled patients. We evaluated biochemical recurrence and clinical and pathological variables in the different GG 4 subgroups. Results: A total of 3195 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 298 patients with GG 4 tumours (pathological Gleason scores [GSs] of 3 + 5 [N = 37], 4 + 4 [N = 257] and 5 + 3 [N = 4]) based on RARP specimens were analysed. The median follow-up period was 25.2 months. The 3-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCRFS) rate in the overall population was 74.5%. The 3-year BCRFS rates in the pathological GS 3 + 5, GS 4 + 4 and GS 5 + 3 subgroups were 93.8%, 71.9% and 50.0%, respectively (P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, pathological GS based on RARP specimens, PSA levels at surgery, pathological T stage, pathological N stage and surgical margins were independent risk factors significantly associated with BCRFS. In particular, patients with pathological GSs 4 + 4 and 5 + 3 were at higher risk of BCR than patients with pathological GS 3 + 5 (hazard ratio 4.54, P = 0.03 and hazard ratio 11.2, P = 0.01, respectively). The study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation. Conclusions: For patients with localized PCa undergoing RARP, pathological GS 4 + 4 and GS 5 + 3 were significantly associated with worse BCRFS than pathological GS 3 + 5. Pathological GS 3 + 5 may be overrated in GG 4. This observation emphasizes that primary and secondary GS should be considered to accurately stratify the risk of BCR after RARP.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)392-399
ページ数8
ジャーナルBJUI Compass
3
5
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2022/09

ASJC Scopus 主題領域

  • 泌尿器学
  • 腫瘍学
  • 外科
  • 腎臓病学

フィンガープリント

「Prognostic differences among Grade Group 4 subgroups in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル