TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnostic model and its utility for non-specialists’ diagnostic accuracy
AU - Katsuki, Masahito
AU - Shimazu, Tomokazu
AU - Kikui, Shoji
AU - Danno, Daisuke
AU - Miyahara, Junichi
AU - Takeshima, Ryusaku
AU - Takeshima, Eriko
AU - Shimazu, Yuki
AU - Nakashima, Takahiro
AU - Matsuo, Mitsuhiro
AU - Takeshima, Takao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: Misdiagnoses of headache disorders are a serious issue. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnosis model using a large questionnaire database in a specialized headache hospital. Methods: Phase 1: We developed an artificial intelligence model based on a retrospective investigation of 4000 patients (2800 training and 1200 test dataset) diagnosed by headache specialists. Phase 2: The model’s efficacy and accuracy were validated. Five non-headache specialists first diagnosed headaches in 50 patients, who were then re-diagnosed using AI. The ground truth was the diagnosis by headache specialists. The diagnostic performance and concordance rates between headache specialists and non-specialists with or without artificial intelligence were evaluated. Results: Phase 1: The model’s macro-average accuracy, sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and F values were 76.25%, 56.26%, 92.16%, 61.24%, and 56.88%, respectively, for the test dataset. Phase 2: Five non-specialists diagnosed headaches without artificial intelligence with 46% overall accuracy and 0.212 kappa for the ground truth. The statistically improved values with artificial intelligence were 83.20% and 0.678, respectively. Other diagnostic indexes were also improved. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence improved the non-specialist diagnostic performance. Given the model’s limitations based on the data from a single center and the low diagnostic accuracy for secondary headaches, further data collection and validation are needed.
AB - Background: Misdiagnoses of headache disorders are a serious issue. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnosis model using a large questionnaire database in a specialized headache hospital. Methods: Phase 1: We developed an artificial intelligence model based on a retrospective investigation of 4000 patients (2800 training and 1200 test dataset) diagnosed by headache specialists. Phase 2: The model’s efficacy and accuracy were validated. Five non-headache specialists first diagnosed headaches in 50 patients, who were then re-diagnosed using AI. The ground truth was the diagnosis by headache specialists. The diagnostic performance and concordance rates between headache specialists and non-specialists with or without artificial intelligence were evaluated. Results: Phase 1: The model’s macro-average accuracy, sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and F values were 76.25%, 56.26%, 92.16%, 61.24%, and 56.88%, respectively, for the test dataset. Phase 2: Five non-specialists diagnosed headaches without artificial intelligence with 46% overall accuracy and 0.212 kappa for the ground truth. The statistically improved values with artificial intelligence were 83.20% and 0.678, respectively. Other diagnostic indexes were also improved. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence improved the non-specialist diagnostic performance. Given the model’s limitations based on the data from a single center and the low diagnostic accuracy for secondary headaches, further data collection and validation are needed.
KW - Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
KW - machine learning
KW - migraine
KW - smartphone application
KW - telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152863825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03331024231156925
DO - 10.1177/03331024231156925
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 37072919
AN - SCOPUS:85152863825
SN - 0333-1024
VL - 43
JO - Cephalalgia
JF - Cephalalgia
IS - 5
ER -