Comparison of histological sample volumes among various endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy needles

Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda*, Tatsuyuki Hanaoka, Yuka Hayashi, Iori Motoo, Shinya Kajiura, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Eisuke Ozawa, Satoshi Miuma, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao

*この論文の責任著者

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

15 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) enables easy and accurate pathological assessment. Here, we compared and assessed the area of samples on glass slides for three needle types: a 19-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), a 22-gauge Franseen needle, and a 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle (EZ Shot 3 Plus; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Among patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, with a ≥20 mm tumor located in the pancreatic body and tail, and who underwent EUS-FNA or FNB between June 2018 and March 2020, 10 were randomly selected to test each needle. The areas of histological tissue and blood clot samples were measured using the BZ-X800 imaging software (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Baseline patient characteristics and pathological sample data showed no significant differences among the needles. The 19-gauge Franseen needle obtained significantly more histological tissue samples than the 19-gauge conventional needle (p = 0.010) and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.008). Conversely, there was no significant difference between the 19-gauge conventional needle and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.838) in this regard. The 19-gauge Franseen needle could collect more samples than the other needles, contributing to giving a more precise pathological diagnosis and more information, including genomic profiling.

本文言語英語
論文番号3560
ジャーナルJournal of Clinical Medicine
10
16
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2021/08/02

ASJC Scopus 主題領域

  • 医学一般

フィンガープリント

「Comparison of histological sample volumes among various endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy needles」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル