Association of Baseline Mitral Valve Area With Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry

Kazunori Mushiake, Shunsuke Kubo*, Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Naoki Nishiura, Kohei Osakada, Kazushige Kadota, Masanori Yamamoto, Mike Saji, Masahiko Asami, Yusuke Enta, Masaki Nakashima, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Izumo, Shingo Mizuno, Yusuke Watanabe, Makoto Amaki, Kazuhisa Kodama, Junichi Yamaguchi, Yuki IzumiToru Naganuma, Hiroki Bota, Yohei Ohno, Masahiro Yamawaki, Hiroshi Ueno, Kazuki Mizutani, Toshiaki Otsuka, Kentaro Hayashida

*この論文の責任著者

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

抄録

BACKGROUND: A small mitral valve area (MVA) is one of the challenging anatomies for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation, but the relationship between baseline MVA and clinical outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association of baseline MVA with procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with MitraClip from the OCEAN-Mitral registry (Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention-Mitral). METHODS: A total of 1768 patients undergoing TEER were divided into 3 groups according to baseline MVA: group 1: <4.0 cm2, n=358; group 2: 4.0-5.0 cm2, n=493; and group 3: ≥5.0 cm2, n=917. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization within 2 years of TEER and compared between the 3 groups. RESULTS: Patients with smaller MVA had significantly fewer clips implanted and higher postprocedural transmitral mean pressure gradient. There was no significant difference in the acute procedural success rate and postprocedural mitral regurgitation severity between the 3 groups. The incidence of the primary end point was similar in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (35.2% versus 34.5% versus 34.0%; P=0.96) and was also similar in patients with MVA <3.5 cm2 and those with MVA 3.5 to 4.0 cm2. The adjusted risk of MVA <4.0 cm2 relative to MVA of 4.0 to 5.0 cm2 and MVA ≥5 cm2 for the primary end point remained insignificant (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.41]; P=0.68; hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.75-1.31]; P=0.96, respectively). At 1 year, no significant difference in the proportion of residual mitral regurgitation 3+/4+ was observed between the 3 groups (7.2% versus 4.4% versus 6.5%; P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TEER, a small MVA <4.0 cm2 may limit the number of clips implanted and increase the transmitral pressure gradient after TEER, but baseline MVA was not associated with mitral regurgitation reduction and clinical outcomes.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)e014420
ジャーナルCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
17
12
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2024/12/01

ASJC Scopus 主題領域

  • 循環器および心血管医学

フィンガープリント

「Association of Baseline Mitral Valve Area With Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル