Supplementary Material for: What Can Be Done to Solve the Unmet Clinical Need of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients following Lenvatinib Failure?

  • Atsushi Hiraoka (作成者)
  • Takashi Kumada (作成者)
  • Toshifumi Tada (作成者)
  • Kazuya Kariyama (作成者)
  • Joji Tani (作成者)
  • Shinya Fukunishi (作成者)
  • Masanori Atsukawa (作成者)
  • Masashi Hirooka (作成者)
  • Kunihiko Tsuji (作成者)
  • Toru Ishikawa (作成者)
  • Koichi Takaguchi (作成者)
  • Ei Itobayashi (作成者)
  • Kazuto Tajiri (作成者)
  • Noritomo Shimada (作成者)
  • Hiroshi Shibata (作成者)
  • Hironori Ochi (作成者)
  • Kazuhito Kawata (作成者)
  • Satoshi Yasuda (作成者)
  • Hidenori Toyoda (作成者)
  • Hideko Ohama (作成者)
  • Kazuhiro Nouso (作成者)
  • Akemi Tsutsui (作成者)
  • Takuya Nagano (作成者)
  • Norio Itokawa (作成者)
  • Korenobu Hayama (作成者)
  • Taeang Arai (作成者)
  • Michitaka Imai (作成者)
  • Yohei Koizumi (作成者)
  • Shinichiro Nakamura (作成者)
  • Kouji Joko (作成者)
  • Kojiro Michitaka (作成者)
  • Yoichi Hiasa (作成者)
  • Masatoshi Kudo (作成者)

データセット

説明

Background/Aim: An effective postprogression treatment of lenvatinib (LEN) against unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) has not been established. We aimed to elucidate the clinical role of continuing LEN beyond progression of disease (PD). Methods: From March 2018 to October 2020, 99 u-HCC patients, in whom PD was confirmed (male:female = 78:21, median age 72 years, Child-Pugh A = 99, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A:B:C = 2:43:54, LEN as first-line = 55), were enrolled (stopped LEN at PD [A group], n = 26; continued LEN beyond PD [B group], n = 73). Radiological response was evaluated with RECIST 1.1. Clinical features and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were retrospectively investigated using inverse probability weighting (IPW) calculated by propensity score. Results: Median time to progression, best response, and modified albumin-bilirubin grade (mALBI) at both baseline and PD did not show significant difference between the groups. Postprogression treatment in the A group was best supportive care in 17, sorafenib in 4, regorafenib in 3, ramucirumab in 1, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in 1. After adjusting with IPW, the B group showed better prognosis in regard to OS after PD and OS after introducing LEN than the A group (10.8/19.6 vs. 5.8/11.2 months, p < 0.001, respectively). In IPW-adjusted Cox hazard multivariate analysis, significant prognostic factors for OS after PD were mALBI 2b/3 at PD (HR 1.983, p = 0.021), decline of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) from baseline at PD (HR 3.180, p < 0.001), elevated alpha-fetoprotein (≥100 ng/mL) at introducing LEN (HR 2.511, p = 0.004), appearance of new extrahepatic metastasis (HR 2.396, p = 0.006), positive for hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) before PD (any grade) (HR 0.292, p < 0.001), and continuing LEN beyond PD (HR 0.297, p < 0.001). Conclusion: When ECOG PS and hepatic reserve function permit, continuing LEN treatment beyond PD, especially in u-HCC patients showed HFSR during LEN treatment, might be a good therapeutic option, at least until a more effective drug as a postprogression treatment after LEN failure is developed.
利用可能になった日2021
出版社Karger Publishers
  • What Can Be Done to Solve the Unmet Clinical Need of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients following Lenvatinib Failure?

    Hiraoka, A., Kumada, T., Tada, T., Kariyama, K., Tani, J., Fukunishi, S., Atsukawa, M., Hirooka, M., Tsuji, K., Ishikawa, T., Takaguchi, K., Itobayashi, E., Tajiri, K., Shimada, N., Shibata, H., Ochi, H., Kawata, K., Yasuda, S., Toyoda, H. & Ohama, H. & 13 others, Nouso, K., Tsutsui, A., Nagano, T., Itokawa, N., Hayama, K., Arai, T., Imai, M., Koizumi, Y., Nakamura, S., Joko, K., Michitaka, K., Hiasa, Y. & Kudo, M., 2021/04, In: Liver Cancer. 10, 2, p. 115-125 11 p.

    研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

    Open Access
    14 被引用数 (Scopus)

引用スタイル