TY - JOUR
T1 - The responses of skin blood flow, mean arterial pressure and R-R interval induced by cold stimulation with cold wind and ice water
AU - Shibahara, Naotoshi
AU - Matsuda, Harumi
AU - Umeno, Katsumi
AU - Shimada, Yutaka
AU - Itoh, Takashi
AU - Terasawa, Katsutoshi
PY - 1996/11/6
Y1 - 1996/11/6
N2 - This study was designed to evaluate the peripheral circulation response to cold wind stimulation. Skin blood flow (SBF), ECG R-R intervals (RRs) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured in ten healthy men under strictly controlled conditions. Cold wind flow and ice water bath were prepared as cold stimulations. The subjects were exposed to each cold stimulation and the values of the responses were simultaneously recorded. The cold wind stimulation reduced SBF (maximally 40.4 ± 3.2%) and increased MAP (maximally 106.9 ± 1.3%), but did not affect RRs. On the other hand, all parameters were affected by the ice water stimulation, which reduced SBF to 16.4 ± 1.2% and RRs to 85.1 ± 3.0%, and increased MAP to 130.6 ± 2.4% compared with the control state. All subjects suffered from intense pain during the ice water but not the cold wind stimulation, and two of them were eliminated from this study because of vagotonia. After phentolamine iontophoresis was used to block the receptor of peripheral α-adrenergic nerve terminals, the cold wind stimulation did not affect SBF. These results suggest that cold wind stimulation is a useful test for evaluating peripheral α-adrenergic nerve function in relation to cold sensation, without increase of RRs and noxious pain.
AB - This study was designed to evaluate the peripheral circulation response to cold wind stimulation. Skin blood flow (SBF), ECG R-R intervals (RRs) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured in ten healthy men under strictly controlled conditions. Cold wind flow and ice water bath were prepared as cold stimulations. The subjects were exposed to each cold stimulation and the values of the responses were simultaneously recorded. The cold wind stimulation reduced SBF (maximally 40.4 ± 3.2%) and increased MAP (maximally 106.9 ± 1.3%), but did not affect RRs. On the other hand, all parameters were affected by the ice water stimulation, which reduced SBF to 16.4 ± 1.2% and RRs to 85.1 ± 3.0%, and increased MAP to 130.6 ± 2.4% compared with the control state. All subjects suffered from intense pain during the ice water but not the cold wind stimulation, and two of them were eliminated from this study because of vagotonia. After phentolamine iontophoresis was used to block the receptor of peripheral α-adrenergic nerve terminals, the cold wind stimulation did not affect SBF. These results suggest that cold wind stimulation is a useful test for evaluating peripheral α-adrenergic nerve function in relation to cold sensation, without increase of RRs and noxious pain.
KW - Cold wind
KW - R-R interval
KW - Skin blood flow
KW - Skin vasomotor function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030572881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0165-1838(96)00065-3
DO - 10.1016/S0165-1838(96)00065-3
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 8946327
AN - SCOPUS:0030572881
SN - 0165-1838
VL - 61
SP - 109
EP - 115
JO - Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System
JF - Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System
IS - 2
ER -