TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin and garenoxacin for the treatment of pneumonia in elderly patients
T2 - A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial
AU - Miyazaki, Taiga
AU - Nakamura, Shigeki
AU - Hashiguchi, Kohji
AU - Kobayashi, Tsutomu
AU - Fukushima, Kiyoyasu
AU - Fukuda, Yuichi
AU - Kondo, Akira
AU - Inoue, Yuichi
AU - Koga, Hironobu
AU - Sasaki, Eisuke
AU - Nagayoshi, Yosuke
AU - Higashiyama, Yasuhito
AU - Yoshida, Masataka
AU - Takazono, Takahiro
AU - Saijo, Tomomi
AU - Morinaga, Yoshitomo
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuko
AU - Imamura, Yoshifumi
AU - Mikushi, Shinya
AU - Izumikawa, Koichi
AU - Yanagihara, Katsunori
AU - Kohno, Shigeru
AU - Mukae, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Oral treatment for elderly outpatients with pneumonia is becoming increasingly important in this super-aged society from the perspective of cost-effectiveness and limited hospital capacities. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of two oral respiratory quinolones, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin, in elderly patients with pneumonia. This randomized, multicenter, open-label trial was conducted among patients aged ≥65 years with clinically and radiographically confirmed pneumonia in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either sitafloxacin (100 mg/day) or garenoxacin (400 mg/day) for 3–10 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical cure rate at 5–10 days after the end of treatment. From December 2013 to November 2017, we enrolled 120 patients at 11 hospitals and randomly assigned 59 patients to the sitafloxacin group (1 patient withdrew) and 61 patients to the garenoxacin group. These included 30 patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) (18 receiving sitafloxacin, 12 receiving garenoxacin) and 37 patients with aspiration pneumonia (16 receiving sitafloxacin, 21 receiving garenoxacin). The clinical cure rates in the sitafloxacin and garenoxacin groups were 88.5% (95% confidence interval: 76.6–95.6) and 88.9% (95% confidence interval: 77.4–95.8), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence rates of drug-related adverse events between the sitafloxacin (20.7%; 12/58 patients) and garenoxacin (27.9%; 17/61 patients) groups. The most common adverse event was hepatic dysfunction, which occurred in seven patients in each group. We conclude that sitafloxacin and garenoxacin are comparably effective and safe for the treatment of pneumonia, including NHCAP and aspiration pneumonia, in elderly patients.
AB - Oral treatment for elderly outpatients with pneumonia is becoming increasingly important in this super-aged society from the perspective of cost-effectiveness and limited hospital capacities. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of two oral respiratory quinolones, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin, in elderly patients with pneumonia. This randomized, multicenter, open-label trial was conducted among patients aged ≥65 years with clinically and radiographically confirmed pneumonia in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either sitafloxacin (100 mg/day) or garenoxacin (400 mg/day) for 3–10 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical cure rate at 5–10 days after the end of treatment. From December 2013 to November 2017, we enrolled 120 patients at 11 hospitals and randomly assigned 59 patients to the sitafloxacin group (1 patient withdrew) and 61 patients to the garenoxacin group. These included 30 patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) (18 receiving sitafloxacin, 12 receiving garenoxacin) and 37 patients with aspiration pneumonia (16 receiving sitafloxacin, 21 receiving garenoxacin). The clinical cure rates in the sitafloxacin and garenoxacin groups were 88.5% (95% confidence interval: 76.6–95.6) and 88.9% (95% confidence interval: 77.4–95.8), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence rates of drug-related adverse events between the sitafloxacin (20.7%; 12/58 patients) and garenoxacin (27.9%; 17/61 patients) groups. The most common adverse event was hepatic dysfunction, which occurred in seven patients in each group. We conclude that sitafloxacin and garenoxacin are comparably effective and safe for the treatment of pneumonia, including NHCAP and aspiration pneumonia, in elderly patients.
KW - Aspiration pneumonia
KW - Community-acquired pneumonia
KW - Garenoxacin
KW - Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia
KW - Sitafloxacin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065781298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.04.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.04.019
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 31113725
AN - SCOPUS:85065781298
SN - 1341-321X
VL - 25
SP - 886
EP - 893
JO - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
IS - 11
ER -