TY - JOUR
T1 - Significance of patient-controlled analgesia in combination with continuous epidural block for patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery
AU - Matsui, H.
AU - Kanamori, M.
AU - Terahata, N.
AU - Miaki, K.
AU - Makiyama, N.
AU - Satone, T.
AU - Tsuji, H.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) combined with continuous epidural block in patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. In group 1 (postoperative PCA group), 23 patients were administered postoperative continuous epidural block in combination with analgesics, which was self-regulated by the patient using a device. In contrast, the 22 patients in group 2 (control group) received suppositories or intramuscular injections of analgesics on request. The following factors were compared between the two groups: pain relief according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment, the frequency of administration of analgesics, and side effects of the postoperative analgesia. The patients in group 1 had more satisfactory relief of pain according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment and needed suppositories and intramuscular injection of analgesics less frequently on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative day. The time spent by nurses on pain management in group 1 was less than that in group 2. No patient had any serious complications in either group. In conclusion, the present patient- controlled method combined with postoperative continuous epidural block could decrease the intensity of postoperative pain and the amount of time spent by nurses on the administration of postoperative analgesics after lumbar spine surgery.
AB - The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) combined with continuous epidural block in patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. In group 1 (postoperative PCA group), 23 patients were administered postoperative continuous epidural block in combination with analgesics, which was self-regulated by the patient using a device. In contrast, the 22 patients in group 2 (control group) received suppositories or intramuscular injections of analgesics on request. The following factors were compared between the two groups: pain relief according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment, the frequency of administration of analgesics, and side effects of the postoperative analgesia. The patients in group 1 had more satisfactory relief of pain according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment and needed suppositories and intramuscular injection of analgesics less frequently on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative day. The time spent by nurses on pain management in group 1 was less than that in group 2. No patient had any serious complications in either group. In conclusion, the present patient- controlled method combined with postoperative continuous epidural block could decrease the intensity of postoperative pain and the amount of time spent by nurses on the administration of postoperative analgesics after lumbar spine surgery.
KW - Lumbar spine
KW - Patient-controlled analgesia
KW - Postoperative analgesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031949519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s005860050041
DO - 10.1007/s005860050041
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 9629935
AN - SCOPUS:0031949519
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 7
SP - 120
EP - 124
JO - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
JF - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
IS - 2
ER -