Risk factors for Ex-Press® surgery failure

Mitsuya Otsuka, Naoki Tojo*, Atsushi Hayashi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the risk factors for Ex-Press® (EXP) surgery failure. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective non-randomized study of 98 patients who had undergone EXP and were followed up ≥ 5 years. We investigated the following nine risk factors: age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), previous glaucoma surgery, type of glaucoma (primary open-angle glaucoma vs. pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma), surgical methods (EXP alone vs. EXP + cataract surgery simultaneously), central corneal thickness (CCT), and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). We defined a successful surgery as a postoperative reduction in the IOP ≥ 20% from the preoperative IOP and ≤ 18 mmHg. We determined the risk factors using multivariate cox regression models. Results: Performing EXP significantly decreased the IOP (preoperative: 25.2 ± 8.7, at 5 years: 11.1 ± 4.1). The success ratio of EXP was 67.4% at 5 years. We found no significant risk factors for EXP surgery failure. The p values of the factors were age (p = 0.936), gender (p = 0.0587), hypertension (p = 0.409), DM (p = 0.967), previous glaucoma surgery (p = 0.940), type of glaucoma (p = 0.435) surgical methods (p = 0.521), CCT (p = 0.091), and preoperative IOP (p = 0.082). Conclusions: No preoperative factors that could be used to predict the failure of EXP surgery were identified. EXP can be safely performed for primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1657-1663
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Ophthalmology
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023/05

Keywords

  • 5 years
  • Ex-Press
  • Glaucoma
  • Risk factor
  • Surgical outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factors for Ex-Press® surgery failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this