Prospective Investigation of Surgical Outcomes after Anterior Decompression with Fusion and Laminoplasty for the Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Toshitaka Yoshii*, Shingo Morishita, Satoru Egawa, Kenichiro Sakai, Kazuo Kusano, Shunji Tsutsui, Takashi Hirai, Yu Matsukura, Kanichiro Wada, Keiichi Katsumi, Masao Koda, Atsushi Kimura, Takeo Furuya, Satoshi Maki, Narihito Nagoshi, Norihiro Nishida, Yukitaka Nagamoto, Yasushi Oshima, Kei Ando, Hiroaki NakashimaMasahiko Takahata, Kanji Mori, Hideaki Nakajima, Kazuma Murata, Masayuki Miyagi, Takashi Kaito, Kei Yamada, Tomohiro Banno, Satoshi Kato, Tetsuro Ohba, Satoshi Inami, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Hiroyuki Katoh, Haruo Kanno, Hiroshi Taneichi, Shiro Imagama, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Katsushi Takeshita, Morio Matsumoto, Masashi Yamazaki, Atsushi Okawa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ideal surgical strategy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Herein, we prospectively investigated the surgical outcomes of anterior cervical decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) with cervical OPLL. Three hundred patients were included in this study (ADF: n = 89; LAMP: n = 211 patients), and propensity score matching yielded 67 pairs of patients with ADF and LAMP, in which clinical outcomes were compared. Crude analysis revealed that the ADF group showed greater neurological recovery in cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association scores at two years, compared with that in the LAMP group (53.1% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.037). The ratio of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) success was significantly greater in the ADF group (59.6% vs. 43.6%, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that the factors affecting MCID success were age, body mass index, duration of symptoms, and choice of ADF. In the 1:1 matched analysis, neurological improvement was more favorable in the ADF group (57.2%) compared to the LAMP group (46.8%) at two years (p = 0.049). However, perioperative complications, such as dysphagia and graft-related complications, were more common in the ADF group.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7012
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume11
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022/12

Keywords

  • anterior decompression and fusion
  • laminoplasty
  • minimum clinically important difference
  • neurological recovery
  • ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
  • propensity score matching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective Investigation of Surgical Outcomes after Anterior Decompression with Fusion and Laminoplasty for the Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this