TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic value of a mandibular canal staging system for primary lesions in patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - a multicenter, retrospective study
AU - Japan Oral Oncology Group (JOOG)
AU - Yamakawa, Nobuhiro
AU - Okura, Masaya
AU - Hasegawa, Takumi
AU - Otsuru, Mitsunobu
AU - Sakai, Hironori
AU - Hirai, Eiji
AU - Rin, Shin
AU - Yamada, Shin Ichi
AU - Yanamoto, Souichi
AU - Yokota, Yusuke
AU - Umeda, Masahiro
AU - Kurita, Hiroshi
AU - Ueda, Michihiro
AU - Akashi, Masaya
AU - Kirita, Tadaaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2024.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background: The Union for International Cancer Control and American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor staging system is used globally for treatment planning. As it may be insufficient for tumor staging of lower gingival carcinomas, we proposed the mandibular canal tumor staging system. In this study, we aimed to compare the two systems for such tumor staging and to identify prognostic markers. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical surgery during 2001–2018. We compared survival rates (Kaplan–Meier estimator) and patient stratification according to the two systems. Results: The proposed system yielded more balanced patient stratification than the existing system. Progression in the tumor grade according to the proposed system was associated with a poorer prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for the entire cohort were 74.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Independent factors affecting overall survival were tumor stage according to the proposed system, excision margins, and number of positive nodes, whereas those affecting disease-specific survival were excision margins and number of positive nodes. Conclusions: Subsite-specific tumor classification should be used for patients with oral cancer, and our results suggest that mandibular canal tumor classification may be effective for patients with lower gingival carcinoma.
AB - Background: The Union for International Cancer Control and American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor staging system is used globally for treatment planning. As it may be insufficient for tumor staging of lower gingival carcinomas, we proposed the mandibular canal tumor staging system. In this study, we aimed to compare the two systems for such tumor staging and to identify prognostic markers. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical surgery during 2001–2018. We compared survival rates (Kaplan–Meier estimator) and patient stratification according to the two systems. Results: The proposed system yielded more balanced patient stratification than the existing system. Progression in the tumor grade according to the proposed system was associated with a poorer prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for the entire cohort were 74.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Independent factors affecting overall survival were tumor stage according to the proposed system, excision margins, and number of positive nodes, whereas those affecting disease-specific survival were excision margins and number of positive nodes. Conclusions: Subsite-specific tumor classification should be used for patients with oral cancer, and our results suggest that mandibular canal tumor classification may be effective for patients with lower gingival carcinoma.
KW - Gingival neoplasms
KW - Mandibular canal
KW - Neoplasm invasiveness
KW - Prognostic factor
KW - TNM classification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192021023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-024-02542-y
DO - 10.1007/s10147-024-02542-y
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 38696052
AN - SCOPUS:85192021023
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 29
SP - 1122
EP - 1132
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 8
ER -