TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive factors and survival outcome of conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab
T2 - Comparative analysis of conversion, partial response and complete response patients
AU - Real‐life Practice Experts for, HCC (RELPEC) Study Group, and, HCC 48 Group (Hepatocellular Carcinoma Experts from 48 Clinics in Japan)
AU - Hatanaka, Takeshi
AU - Kakizaki, Satoru
AU - Hiraoka, Atsushi
AU - Tada, Toshifumi
AU - Hirooka, Masashi
AU - Kariyama, Kazuya
AU - Tani, Joji
AU - Atsukawa, Masanori
AU - Takaguchi, Koichi
AU - Itobayashi, Ei
AU - Fukunishi, Shinya
AU - Tsuji, Kunihiko
AU - Ishikawa, Toru
AU - Tajiri, Kazuto
AU - Toyoda, Hidenori
AU - Ogawa, Chikara
AU - Nishikawa, Hiroki
AU - Nishimura, Takashi
AU - Kawata, Kazuhito
AU - Kosaka, Hisashi
AU - Naganuma, Atsushi
AU - Yata, Yutaka
AU - Ohama, Hideko
AU - Kuroda, Hidekatsu
AU - Matono, Tomomitsu
AU - Aoki, Tomoko
AU - Kanayama, Yuki
AU - Tanaka, Kazunari
AU - Tada, Fujimasa
AU - Nouso, Kazuhiro
AU - Morishita, Asahiro
AU - Tsutsui, Akemi
AU - Nagano, Takuya
AU - Itokawa, Norio
AU - Okubo, Tomomi
AU - Arai, Taeang
AU - Imai, Michitaka
AU - Nakamura, Shinichiro
AU - Enomoto, Hirayuki
AU - Kaibori, Masaki
AU - Hiasa, Yoichi
AU - Kudo, Masatoshi
AU - Kumada, Takashi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - AIM: This study aims to investigate the predictive factors for conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and to evaluate the prognosis of conversion cases by comparing them with partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) cases. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, we included a total of 946 uHCC patients treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) from September 2020 to September 2023. RESULTS: Out of the patients, 43 (4.5%) received conversion therapy following Atez/Bev treatment. The overall response rate was 65.1% and 23.7% in the conversion and non-conversion group, respectively, with a statistical significance (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified that BCLC stage B or an earlier stage (p = 0.045), absence of macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread (p = 0.045), and a low value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.04) were significantly favourable predictive factors associated with conversion therapy. The conversion group showed significantly better survival compared to the non-conversion group (p < 0.001). In the landmark analysis at 6, 12 and 18 months, the conversion group exhibited better survival compared to PR patients in the non-conversion group (p = 0.04, 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and there were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) between the conversion group and patients who achieved a CR (p = 0.7, 1.0 and 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low tumour burden and low value of NLR were more likely to undergo conversion therapy. The OS of patients undergoing conversion therapy showed better survival compared to those achieving PR and was comparable to those with CR patients. Conversion therapy could be considered if feasible.
AB - AIM: This study aims to investigate the predictive factors for conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) and to evaluate the prognosis of conversion cases by comparing them with partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) cases. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, we included a total of 946 uHCC patients treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) from September 2020 to September 2023. RESULTS: Out of the patients, 43 (4.5%) received conversion therapy following Atez/Bev treatment. The overall response rate was 65.1% and 23.7% in the conversion and non-conversion group, respectively, with a statistical significance (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified that BCLC stage B or an earlier stage (p = 0.045), absence of macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread (p = 0.045), and a low value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.04) were significantly favourable predictive factors associated with conversion therapy. The conversion group showed significantly better survival compared to the non-conversion group (p < 0.001). In the landmark analysis at 6, 12 and 18 months, the conversion group exhibited better survival compared to PR patients in the non-conversion group (p = 0.04, 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and there were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) between the conversion group and patients who achieved a CR (p = 0.7, 1.0 and 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low tumour burden and low value of NLR were more likely to undergo conversion therapy. The OS of patients undergoing conversion therapy showed better survival compared to those achieving PR and was comparable to those with CR patients. Conversion therapy could be considered if feasible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207022042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/apt.18237
DO - 10.1111/apt.18237
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 39233317
AN - SCOPUS:85207022042
SN - 0269-2813
VL - 60
SP - 1361
EP - 1373
JO - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
JF - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
IS - 10
ER -