TY - JOUR
T1 - Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery
AU - Ueda-Consolvo, Tomoko
AU - Otsuka, Mitsuya
AU - Hayashi, Yumiko
AU - Ishida, Masaaki
AU - Hayashi, Atsushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo et al.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of setting a preferred retinal locus relocation target (PRT) and performing Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) biofeedback training in patients showing insufficient recovery of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) despite successful closure of an idiopathic macular hole (MH). Methods. Retrospective interventional case series. Nine eyes of 9 consecutive patients with the decimal BCVA of less than 0.6 at more than 3 months after successful MH surgery were included. A PRT was chosen based on MAIA microperimetry and the patients underwent MAIA biofeedback training. BCVA, reading speed, fixation stability, and 63% bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were evaluated before and after the training. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired Student's t -test. Results. PRT was chosen on the nasal side of the closed MH fovea in 8 patients. After the MAIA training, BCVA improved in all patients. The mean logMAR value of BCVA significantly improved from 0.33 to 0.12 (p = 0.0 07). Reading speed improved in all patients (p = 0.2 9), fixation stability improved in 5 patients (p = 0. 70), and 63% BCEA improved in 7 patients (p = 0.21), although these improvements were not statistically significant. Conclusion. MAIA biofeedback training improved visual acuity in patients with insufficient recovery of BCVA after successful MH surgery.
AB - Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of setting a preferred retinal locus relocation target (PRT) and performing Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) biofeedback training in patients showing insufficient recovery of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) despite successful closure of an idiopathic macular hole (MH). Methods. Retrospective interventional case series. Nine eyes of 9 consecutive patients with the decimal BCVA of less than 0.6 at more than 3 months after successful MH surgery were included. A PRT was chosen based on MAIA microperimetry and the patients underwent MAIA biofeedback training. BCVA, reading speed, fixation stability, and 63% bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were evaluated before and after the training. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired Student's t -test. Results. PRT was chosen on the nasal side of the closed MH fovea in 8 patients. After the MAIA training, BCVA improved in all patients. The mean logMAR value of BCVA significantly improved from 0.33 to 0.12 (p = 0.0 07). Reading speed improved in all patients (p = 0.2 9), fixation stability improved in 5 patients (p = 0. 70), and 63% BCEA improved in 7 patients (p = 0.21), although these improvements were not statistically significant. Conclusion. MAIA biofeedback training improved visual acuity in patients with insufficient recovery of BCVA after successful MH surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953924424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2015/572942
DO - 10.1155/2015/572942
M3 - 学術論文
AN - SCOPUS:84953924424
SN - 2090-004X
VL - 2015
JO - Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - Journal of Ophthalmology
M1 - 572942
ER -