How to consider the indication of leadless pacemaker versus conventional transvenous pacemaker following their comparison in cost-effectiveness

Naoya Kataoka; Teruhiko Imamura

doi:10.1002/joa3.13198

How to consider the indication of leadless pacemaker versus conventional transvenous pacemaker following their comparison in cost-effectiveness

Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Internal Medicine （2）

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Article number	e13198
Journal	Journal of Arrhythmia
Volume	41
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.13198
State	Published - 2025/02

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/joa3.13198

Cite this

@article{9e9889cb3a314c7b9a36af7c6c171366,

title = "How to consider the indication of leadless pacemaker versus conventional transvenous pacemaker following their comparison in cost-effectiveness",

author = "Naoya Kataoka and Teruhiko Imamura",

year = "2025",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1002/joa3.13198",

language = "英語",

volume = "41",

journal = "Journal of Arrhythmia",

issn = "1880-4276",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to consider the indication of leadless pacemaker versus conventional transvenous pacemaker following their comparison in cost-effectiveness

AU - Kataoka, Naoya

AU - Imamura, Teruhiko

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210985755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/joa3.13198

DO - 10.1002/joa3.13198

M3 - Letter

C2 - 39816998

AN - SCOPUS:85210985755

SN - 1880-4276

VL - 41

JO - Journal of Arrhythmia

JF - Journal of Arrhythmia

IS - 1

M1 - e13198

ER -