Extremely Small 20-mm Versus Standard-Size Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves: Propensity-Matched Analysis From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry

Taishi Okuno, Masaki Izumo*, Kai Takahiko, Shingo Kuwata, Masashi Koga, Yoshihiro J. Akashi, Shinichi Shirai, Yusuke Watanabe, Toru Naganuma, Norio Tada, Futoshi Yamanaka, Masahiko Noguchi, Hiroshi Ueno, Yohei Ohno, Hidetaka Nishina, Kensuke Takagi, Masahiko Asami, Kazuki Mizutani, Fumiaki Yashima, Toshiaki OtsukaMasanori Yamamoto, Kentaro Hayashida

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The 20-mm balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) represents the smallest available option for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Its current underutilization stems from concerns regarding prosthesis-patient mismatch, durability, and potential adverse outcomes. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes between the 20-mm balloon-expandable THVs and standard-size balloon-expandable THVs. Methods: Patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with SAPIEN THVs were sourced from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention) registry, an ongoing, multicenter cohort study that has enrolled over 7,000 TAVR patients in Japan. A 1:3 propensity-matched analysis, based on 24 baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables, was used to contrast the 20-mm with >20-mm balloon-expandable THVs. Results: Of 5,086 eligible patients, 284 (5.6%) received the 20-mm balloon-expandable THV. After propensity-matching, the 20-mm THV group (n = 276) and the >20-mm THV group (n = 828) demonstrated balanced baseline characteristics, with an absolute standardized difference <0.10. The average follow-up duration for patients who were alive was 955 ± 512 days, and the average time to death was 584 ± 543 days. The 20-mm group showed a higher frequency of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (moderate PPM: 29.2% vs 10.8%; severe PPM: 4.9% vs 1.5%; P < 0.001). Over a 5-year period, all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization rates were comparable between the 2 groups (all-cause mortality: 34.2% vs 38.0%; HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.74-1.37; P = 0.970; heart failure rehospitalization: 15.2% vs 16.3%; HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.50-1.29; P = 0.371). Conclusions: This registry-based study suggests that the initially observed inferior forward hemodynamics associated with the 20-mm THV do not translate into heightened long-term mortality or heart failure rehospitalization risks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-254
Number of pages10
JournalJACC: Asia
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025/02

Keywords

  • aortic valve stenosis
  • paravalvular regurgitation
  • prosthesis-patient mismatch
  • transcatheter aortic valve replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extremely Small 20-mm Versus Standard-Size Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves: Propensity-Matched Analysis From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this