Evaluation of the Sperm Motility Analyzer System (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men

Takuya Akashi*, Akihiko Watanabe, Akira Komiya, Hideki Fuse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Eighty-one fresh semen samples were analyzed to compare the sperm parameters obtained using the new Sperm Motility Analysis System (SMAS; version 1.0, Kaga Electronics, Tokyo, Japan) with the CellSoftTM Series 3000 (CRYO Resources, New York, USA) computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system and conventional manual semen analysis, based on WHO guidelines.. Significant correlations of sperm concentration (p<0.0001) and sperm motility (p<0.0001) were observed between SMAS and manual semen analysis estimates. There were also significant correlations of sperm concentration (p=0.0003) and sperm motility (p<0.0001) between SMAS and CellSoft estimates. Significant correlations for motility-related parameters were demonstrated in sperm velocity (p<0.0001), and linearity (linear velocity (VSL) divided by curvilinear velocity (VCL)×100) (p<0.0001), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) (p<0.0001), and beat/cross frequency (BCF) (p=0.0127), between SMAS and CellSoft estimates. In this study, we showed the usefulness of the new SMAS, which has high reliability in estimating sperm concentration, sperm motility, velocity and linearity compared with CellSoft. SMAS can be a promising alternative, providing cost-effective semen analysis with the utility of the CASA system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-477
Number of pages5
JournalSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010/12

Keywords

  • CASA
  • Male infertility
  • SMAS
  • Semen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the Sperm Motility Analyzer System (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this