TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness and Safety of Second-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors After Discontinuation of First-line Immune-oncology Combination Therapy Because of Adverse Events in the Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
AU - Japanese Urological Oncology Group
AU - Takahashi, Masayuki
AU - Matsushita, Yuto
AU - Kojima, Takahiro
AU - Osawa, Takahiro
AU - Sazuka, Tomokazu
AU - Hatakeyama, Shingo
AU - Goto, Keisuke
AU - Numakura, Kazuyuki
AU - Yamana, Kazutoshi
AU - Kandori, Shuya
AU - Fujita, Kazutoshi
AU - Ueda, Kosuke
AU - Tanaka, Hajime
AU - Tomida, Ryotaro
AU - Kurahashi, Toshifumi
AU - Bando, Yukari
AU - Kimura, Takahiro
AU - Nishiyama, Naotaka
AU - Yamashita, Shimpei
AU - Taniguchi, Hisanori
AU - Monji, Keisuke
AU - Ishiyama, Ryo
AU - Kawasaki, Yoshihide
AU - Kato, Takuma
AU - Tatarano, Shuichi
AU - Masui, Kimihiko
AU - Nakamura, Eijiro
AU - Kaneko, Tomoyuki
AU - Miyake, Makito
AU - Kitano, Goshi
AU - Motoshima, Takanobu
AU - Shiraishi, Yusuke
AU - Kira, Satoru
AU - Murashima, Takaya
AU - Hara, Hiroaki
AU - Matsumura, Masafumi
AU - Kitamura, Hiroshi
AU - Miyake, Hideaki
AU - Furukawa, Junya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Introduction: Effectiveness and safety of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for whom first-line immuno-oncology (I-O) combination therapy was discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) remain to be determined. Patients and methods: Clinicopathological data were retrospectively collected from 34 institutions between August 2018 and January 2022 for 243 patients with mRCC who received second-line TKIs after first-line I-O combination therapy. Two patients who requested discontinuation of first-line I-O combination therapy were excluded. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between patients who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of progressive disease (Group PD) and AEs (Group AE). First- and second-line overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from the start of first- and second-line therapy to death, respectively. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust prognostic factors between the 2 groups. Results: There were 179 patients in Group PD and 62 patients in Group AE. Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar between the 2 groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), second-line OS, and first-line OS were significantly longer in Group AE than in Group PD (median 13.6 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.005; median not reached [NR] vs. 19.5 months, P =.005; median NR vs. 30.8 months, P =.012, respectively). After propensity score matching, PFS and second-line OS were still significantly longer and first-line OS tended to be longer in Group AE than in Group PD. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of AEs of any grade, including severe grades of 3 or greater, between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Second-line TKIs are safe and at least as effective in patients with mRCC who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of AEs as they are in patients who discontinued because of PD.
AB - Introduction: Effectiveness and safety of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for whom first-line immuno-oncology (I-O) combination therapy was discontinued because of adverse events (AEs) remain to be determined. Patients and methods: Clinicopathological data were retrospectively collected from 34 institutions between August 2018 and January 2022 for 243 patients with mRCC who received second-line TKIs after first-line I-O combination therapy. Two patients who requested discontinuation of first-line I-O combination therapy were excluded. Oncological outcomes and safety were compared between patients who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of progressive disease (Group PD) and AEs (Group AE). First- and second-line overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from the start of first- and second-line therapy to death, respectively. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust prognostic factors between the 2 groups. Results: There were 179 patients in Group PD and 62 patients in Group AE. Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar between the 2 groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), second-line OS, and first-line OS were significantly longer in Group AE than in Group PD (median 13.6 months vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.005; median not reached [NR] vs. 19.5 months, P =.005; median NR vs. 30.8 months, P =.012, respectively). After propensity score matching, PFS and second-line OS were still significantly longer and first-line OS tended to be longer in Group AE than in Group PD. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of AEs of any grade, including severe grades of 3 or greater, between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Second-line TKIs are safe and at least as effective in patients with mRCC who discontinued first-line I-O combination therapy because of AEs as they are in patients who discontinued because of PD.
KW - Immune-related adverse event
KW - Immuno-oncology drug
KW - Propensity score matching
KW - Second-line therapy
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000512413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102322
DO - 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102322
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 40118720
AN - SCOPUS:105000512413
SN - 1558-7673
VL - 23
JO - Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
JF - Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
IS - 3
M1 - 102322
ER -