Description of the basic features of parent-offspring stomodeal trophallaxis in the subsocial wood-feeding cockroach Salganea esakii (Dictyoptera, Blaberidae, Panesthiinae)

Keisuke Shimada, Kiyoto Maekawa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

In subsocial xylophagous cockroaches it is thought that parental feeding is important for the survival and growth of the altricial offspring, but the details of parental feeding in these groups are poorly known. We observed stomodeal (oral) trophallaxis between parents and the 2nd or 3rd instars of the wood-feeding cockroach Salganea esakii Roth, and here report basic features of trophallaxis in young families. Both the female and male parents fed young nymphs with stomodeal food, and there was no difference in the frequency of the behavior between parental sexes. Up to three nymphs could be fed simultaneously during a single trophallactic event. Adults occasionally rejected contact with nymphs by blocking them with their forelegs. Nymphs utilized trophallactic food from parents more frequently than feeding independently on wood pieces or fecal pellets. Trophallaxis between sibling nymphs was never observed. These results suggest that the 2nd and 3rd instar nymphs rely on the stomodeal substances provided by their parents, and that provisioning is an essential component of subsocial behavior in biparental wood-feeding cockroaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-12
Number of pages4
JournalEntomological Science
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011/01

Keywords

  • Biparental family
  • Subsocial cockroach
  • Xylophagy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Description of the basic features of parent-offspring stomodeal trophallaxis in the subsocial wood-feeding cockroach Salganea esakii (Dictyoptera, Blaberidae, Panesthiinae)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this