TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical usefulness of newly developed prognostic predictive score for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma
AU - Ohama, Hideko
AU - Hiraoka, Atsushi
AU - Tada, Toshifumi
AU - Hirooka, Masashi
AU - Kariyama, Kazuya
AU - Hatanaka, Takeshi
AU - Tani, Joji
AU - Takaguchi, Koichi
AU - Atsukawa, Masanori
AU - Itobayashi, Ei
AU - Nishimura, Takashi
AU - Tsuji, Kunihiko
AU - Tajiri, Kazuto
AU - Ishikawa, Toru
AU - Yasuda, Satoshi
AU - Toyoda, Hidenori
AU - Fukunishi, Shinya
AU - Ogawa, Chikara
AU - Kakizaki, Satoru
AU - Shimada, Noritomo
AU - Naganuma, Atsushi
AU - Kawata, Kazuhito
AU - Kosaka, Hisashi
AU - Kuroda, Hidekatsu
AU - Matono, Tomomitsu
AU - Yata, Yutaka
AU - Ochi, Hironori
AU - Tada, Fujimasa
AU - Nouso, Kazuhiro
AU - Morishita, Asahiro
AU - Itokawa, Norio
AU - Okubo, Tomomi
AU - Arai, Taeang
AU - Tsutsui, Akemi
AU - Nagano, Takuya
AU - Yokohama, Keisuke
AU - Nishikawa, Hiroki
AU - Imai, Michitaka
AU - Koizumi, Yohei
AU - Nakamura, Shinichiro
AU - Iijima, Hiroko
AU - Kaibori, Masaki
AU - Hiasa, Yoichi
AU - Kumada, Takashi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Aims: The aim of the present study was to elucidate detailed parameters for prediction of prognosis for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment. Methods: A total of 719 patients (males 577, median age 74 years) treated with Atez/Bev between September 2020 and January 2023 were enrolled. Factors related to overall survival (OS) were extracted and a prognostic scoring system based on hazard ratio (HR) was created. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively examined, and the prognostic ability of the newly developed system was compared to CRAFITY score using concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) results. Results: Cox-hazards multivariate analysis showed BCLC classification C/D (HR 1.4; 1 point), AFP ≥100 ng/mL (HR 1.4; 1 point), mALBI 2a (HR 1.7; 1 point), mALBI 2b/3 (HR 2.8; 2 points), and DCP ≥100 mAU/mL (HR 1.6; 1 point) as significant factors. The assigned points were added and used to develop the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI-De) scoring system. For IMABALI-De scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, OS was not applicable (NA), NA, 26.11, 18.79, 14.07, and 8.32 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 2788.67, c-index 0.699), while for CRAFITY scores of 0, 1, and 2, OS was 26.11, 20.29, and 11.32 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 2864.54, c-index 0.606). PFS periods for those IMABALI-De scores were 21.75, 12.89, 9.18, 8.0, 5.0, and 3.75 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 5203.32, c-index 0.623) and for the CRAFITY scores were 10.32, 7.68, and 3.57 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 5246.61, c-index 0.574). As compared with CRAFITY score, IMABALI-De score had better AIC and c-index results for both OS and PFS. Conclusion: The present results indicated that the proposed IMABALI-De score may be favorable for predicting prognosis of uHCC patients receiving Atez/Bev therapy.
AB - Aims: The aim of the present study was to elucidate detailed parameters for prediction of prognosis for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment. Methods: A total of 719 patients (males 577, median age 74 years) treated with Atez/Bev between September 2020 and January 2023 were enrolled. Factors related to overall survival (OS) were extracted and a prognostic scoring system based on hazard ratio (HR) was created. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively examined, and the prognostic ability of the newly developed system was compared to CRAFITY score using concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) results. Results: Cox-hazards multivariate analysis showed BCLC classification C/D (HR 1.4; 1 point), AFP ≥100 ng/mL (HR 1.4; 1 point), mALBI 2a (HR 1.7; 1 point), mALBI 2b/3 (HR 2.8; 2 points), and DCP ≥100 mAU/mL (HR 1.6; 1 point) as significant factors. The assigned points were added and used to develop the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI-De) scoring system. For IMABALI-De scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, OS was not applicable (NA), NA, 26.11, 18.79, 14.07, and 8.32 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 2788.67, c-index 0.699), while for CRAFITY scores of 0, 1, and 2, OS was 26.11, 20.29, and 11.32 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 2864.54, c-index 0.606). PFS periods for those IMABALI-De scores were 21.75, 12.89, 9.18, 8.0, 5.0, and 3.75 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 5203.32, c-index 0.623) and for the CRAFITY scores were 10.32, 7.68, and 3.57 months, respectively (p <.001; AIC 5246.61, c-index 0.574). As compared with CRAFITY score, IMABALI-De score had better AIC and c-index results for both OS and PFS. Conclusion: The present results indicated that the proposed IMABALI-De score may be favorable for predicting prognosis of uHCC patients receiving Atez/Bev therapy.
KW - CRAFITY score
KW - IMABALI score
KW - IMABALI-De score
KW - atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - modified albumin-bilirubin grade
KW - prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189613475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cnr2.2042
DO - 10.1002/cnr2.2042
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 38577725
AN - SCOPUS:85189613475
SN - 2573-8348
VL - 7
JO - Cancer Reports
JF - Cancer Reports
IS - 4
M1 - e2042
ER -