TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage
T2 - 2018
AU - Isayama, Hiroyuki
AU - Nakai, Yousuke
AU - Itoi, Takao
AU - Yasuda, Ichiro
AU - Kawakami, Hiroshi
AU - Ryozawa, Shomei
AU - Kitano, Masayuki
AU - Irisawa, Atsushi
AU - Katanuma, Akio
AU - Hara, Kazuo
AU - Iwashita, Takuji
AU - Fujita, Naotaka
AU - Yamao, Kenji
AU - Yoshida, Masahiro
AU - Inui, Kazuo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a relatively new modality for biliary drainage after failed or difficult transpapillary biliary cannulation. Despite its clinical utility, EUS-BD can be complicated by severe adverse events such as bleeding, perforation, and peritonitis. The aim of this paper is to provide practice guidelines for safe performance of EUS-BD as well as safe introduction of the procedure to non-expert centers. The guidelines comprised patient–intervention–comparison–outcome-formatted clinical questions (CQs) and questions (Qs), which are background statements to facilitate understanding of the CQs. A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Statement, evidence level, and strength of recommendation were created according to the GRADE system. Four committees were organized: guideline creation, expert panelist, evaluation, and external evaluation committees. We developed 13 CQs (methods, device selection, supportive treatment, management of adverse events, education and ethics) and six Qs (definition, indication, outcomes and adverse events) with statements, evidence levels, and strengths of recommendation. The guidelines explain the technical aspects, management of adverse events, and ethics of EUS-BD and its introduction to non-expert institutions.
AB - Endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a relatively new modality for biliary drainage after failed or difficult transpapillary biliary cannulation. Despite its clinical utility, EUS-BD can be complicated by severe adverse events such as bleeding, perforation, and peritonitis. The aim of this paper is to provide practice guidelines for safe performance of EUS-BD as well as safe introduction of the procedure to non-expert centers. The guidelines comprised patient–intervention–comparison–outcome-formatted clinical questions (CQs) and questions (Qs), which are background statements to facilitate understanding of the CQs. A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Statement, evidence level, and strength of recommendation were created according to the GRADE system. Four committees were organized: guideline creation, expert panelist, evaluation, and external evaluation committees. We developed 13 CQs (methods, device selection, supportive treatment, management of adverse events, education and ethics) and six Qs (definition, indication, outcomes and adverse events) with statements, evidence levels, and strengths of recommendation. The guidelines explain the technical aspects, management of adverse events, and ethics of EUS-BD and its introduction to non-expert institutions.
KW - Biliary stricture
KW - EUS-guided biliary drainage
KW - Endoscopic ultrasonography
KW - Interventional EUS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068254368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jhbp.631
DO - 10.1002/jhbp.631
M3 - 学術論文
C2 - 31025816
AN - SCOPUS:85068254368
SN - 1868-6974
VL - 26
SP - 249
EP - 269
JO - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
JF - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
IS - 7
ER -