Association between adolescent pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, a multicenter cross sectional Japanese study

Kohei Ogawa*, Sachio Matsushima, Kevin Y. Urayama, Norihiko Kikuchi, Noriyuki Nakamura, Shinji Tanigaki, Haruhiko Sago, Shoji Satoh, Shigeru Saito, Naho Morisaki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

We aimed to clarify how maternal physical characteristics explains the association between adolescent pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, focusing on their height. We used a national multicenter-based delivery registry among 30,831 women under age 25 years with a singleton pregnancy between 2005 and 2011. Adolescent pregnancy was defined as younger than 20 years of age, and categorized into “junior adolescent” (aged ≤15 years) and “senior adolescent” (aged 16–19 years). We used multivariate Poisson regression and mediation analysis to assess the extent to which maternal height explained the association between adolescent pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Risks for preterm birth [(adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08–1.27], low birthweight (aRR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.01–1.15), and low Apgar score (aRR 1.41 95%CI, 1.15–1.73) were significantly higher among adolescent women compared to women of 20–24 years of age. The mediation effect of maternal height on these outcomes were moderate for low birthweight (45.5%) and preterm birth (10.5%), and smaller for low Apgar score (6.6%). In all analyses, we did not detect significant differences between junior adolescent and senior adolescent. Adolescent women have higher risk of adverse birth outcomes. This association is partially mediated by shorter maternal height.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2365
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019/12/01

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between adolescent pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, a multicenter cross sectional Japanese study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this